0%
All-Mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality, according to recent study.
Read MoreNonprofit Vote provided comprehensive research into the 2018 elections showing the three reforms that had the most positive impact on voter engagement. They were: VAH, Same Day Registration, and Automatic Voter Registration.
Read More2018 primary turnout results: Vote-at-home-centric states saw a 15 percent higher median turnout than polling-place-centric states.
Read More2018 midterm turnout results: States that use the vote-at-home system and high absentee system top the results. The top 6 states are either in Step 5 or Step 4 on the vote-at-home scale of mailed-ballot access and scrolling to the section “Five Steps towards a Complete Vote-at-Home System.”
Read MoreResearch into Utah’s 2016 election with some counties shifted to a vote at home system, and others still using a polling-place model. Counties that used the vote at home model counties saw 5-7 percentage points higher turnout, with 10 percent higher among 25-34 year-olds.
Read MoreResearch into down-ballot engagement differences in Utah’s 2016 election between counties with a vote at home system and counties that used traditional polling places. Counties with vote-at-home systems showed a 5.5 percentage point increase in turnout in State House races.
Read More2016 survey of Oregon voters showed 87% with a positive view of the vote at home model.
Read More2016 MIT Research -Past, Present, and Future Advancements in Voting by Mail in the US.
Read MoreVoter turnout was the highest it has been in 100 YEARS🙌 Today and every day, we are thankful for ... a democracy that built on the voices of the people and we will continue working to make sure that voting is easy, accessible and safe for EVERY VOTER🤝
